CLEW vs RenalSense
CLEW vs RenalSense, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CLEW is on 63/100 and RenalSense on 50/100.
Where each one leads
CLEW
- our overall score: 63/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 19 against 7
- headcount growth: -12.1% against -32.0%
- LinkedIn following: 2,131 against 1,146
RenalSense
- funding raised: $34.0M against $20.5M
At a glance
| Measure | CLEW | RenalSense |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intelligent clinical surveillance platform for proactive patient care and optimized hospital interventions. | RenalSense develops Clarity RMS, a real-time urine flow monitoring system for early detection of acute kidney injury in critical care. |
| Category | Healthcare, Emergency Room, ICU Management, Predictive Analytics | Healthcare, ICU Management, Urine, Patient Care |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Netanya, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CLEW | RenalSense |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 7 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -12.1% | -32.0% |
| Total funding | $20.5M | $34.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,131 | 1,146 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CLEW | RenalSense |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CLEW | RenalSense |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
What users say
| Measure | CLEW | RenalSense |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“RenalSense Announces Distribution Agreement With Fresenius Medical Care.   submitted by   /u/prnewswireadmin   to   r/prnewswire [link]   [comments]”r/prnewswire
CLEW vs RenalSense: common questions
Which is better, CLEW or RenalSense?
On our 0-100 score CLEW rates higher (63/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CLEW and RenalSense compare on the numbers?
CLEW leads on our overall score (63/100 against 50/100), headcount (19 against 7), headcount growth (-12.1% against -32.0%), LinkedIn following (2,131 against 1,146). RenalSense leads on funding raised ($34.0M against $20.5M).
What do real users say about CLEW and RenalSense?
RenalSense: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/prnewswire.
Read the full CLEW review and pricing or the RenalSense review and pricing. You can also browse other CLEW alternatives we track.