CLEW vs Opmed.AI
CLEW vs Opmed.AI, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CLEW is on 63/100 and Opmed.AI on 58/100.
Where each one leads
CLEW
- our overall score: 63/100 against 58/100
- funding raised: $20.5M against $15.0M
Opmed.AI
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 41/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 64 against 19
- headcount growth: +72.2% against -12.1%
- LinkedIn following: 9,858 against 2,131
At a glance
| Measure | CLEW | Opmed.AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intelligent clinical surveillance platform for proactive patient care and optimized hospital interventions. | AI-powered platform optimizing healthcare planning and hospital operations, especially OR scheduling. |
| Category | Healthcare, Emergency Room, ICU Management, Predictive Analytics | Healthcare, Hospital, Optimization, Planning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CLEW | Opmed.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 64 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -12.1% | +72.2% |
| Total funding | $20.5M | $15.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,131 | 9,858 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CLEW | Opmed.AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 27/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CLEW | Opmed.AI |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
CLEW vs Opmed.AI: common questions
Which is better, CLEW or Opmed.AI?
On our 0-100 score CLEW rates higher (63/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CLEW and Opmed.AI compare on the numbers?
CLEW leads on our overall score (63/100 against 58/100), funding raised ($20.5M against $15.0M). Opmed.AI leads on agent readiness (40/100 against 21/100), domain rating (41/100 against 29/100), headcount (64 against 19), headcount growth (+72.2% against -12.1%), LinkedIn following (9,858 against 2,131).
Read the full CLEW review and pricing or the Opmed.AI review and pricing. You can also browse other CLEW alternatives we track.