CLEW vs GE HealthCare
CLEW vs GE HealthCare, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CLEW is on 63/100 and GE HealthCare on 21/100.
Where each one leads
CLEW
- our overall score: 63/100 against 21/100
GE HealthCare
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 81/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 60,162 against 19
- LinkedIn following: 2,910,147 against 2,131
At a glance
| Measure | CLEW | GE HealthCare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intelligent clinical surveillance platform for proactive patient care and optimized hospital interventions. | A global medical technology, diagnostics, and digital solutions innovator, providing integrated solutions for precision health. |
| Category | Healthcare, Emergency Room, ICU Management, Predictive Analytics | MedTech, HealthTech, Medical Imaging, Ultrasound |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2015 | 1994 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Chicago, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CLEW | GE HealthCare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 60,162 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -12.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $20.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,131 | 2,910,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CLEW | GE HealthCare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 21/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CLEW | GE HealthCare |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
CLEW vs GE HealthCare: common questions
Which is better, CLEW or GE HealthCare?
On our 0-100 score CLEW rates higher (63/100 against 21/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CLEW and GE HealthCare compare on the numbers?
CLEW leads on our overall score (63/100 against 21/100). GE HealthCare leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 21/100), domain rating (81/100 against 29/100), headcount (60,162 against 19), LinkedIn following (2,910,147 against 2,131).
Read the full CLEW review and pricing or the GE HealthCare review and pricing. You can also browse other CLEW alternatives we track.

