CLEW vs EarlySense
CLEW vs EarlySense, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CLEW is on 63/100 and EarlySense on 65/100.
Where each one leads
CLEW
- headcount growth: -12.1% against -27.2%
EarlySense
- domain rating: 38/100 against 29/100
- funding raised: $131M against $20.5M
- LinkedIn following: 10,030 against 2,131
At a glance
| Measure | CLEW | EarlySense |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intelligent clinical surveillance platform for proactive patient care and optimized hospital interventions. | EarlySense provides a continuous patient monitoring solution to enhance safety and reduce risk for general care patients. |
| Category | Healthcare, Emergency Room, ICU Management, Predictive Analytics | Healthcare, Monitor, Patient, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Ramat Gan, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CLEW | EarlySense |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 18 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -12.1% | -27.2% |
| Total funding | $20.5M | $131M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $325M |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,131 | 10,030 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CLEW | EarlySense |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 38/100 |
CLEW vs EarlySense: common questions
Which is better, CLEW or EarlySense?
On our 0-100 score EarlySense rates higher (65/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CLEW and EarlySense compare on the numbers?
CLEW leads on headcount growth (-12.1% against -27.2%). EarlySense leads on domain rating (38/100 against 29/100), funding raised ($131M against $20.5M), LinkedIn following (10,030 against 2,131).
Read the full CLEW review and pricing or the EarlySense review and pricing. You can also browse other CLEW alternatives we track.