Cleo Capital vs Tributary Group
Cleo Capital vs Tributary Group, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cleo Capital is on 44/100 and Tributary Group on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Cleo Capital
- headcount: 9 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 6,528 against 84
Tributary Group
- our overall score: 52/100 against 44/100
- funding raised: $63.0M against $3.8M
At a glance
| Measure | Cleo Capital | Tributary Group |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Venture capital firm focused on early-stage European tech startups. | A holding company focused on acquiring and growing founder-owned, mission-critical software businesses. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Fintech, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech | Venture Capital, Private Equity, Holding Company, Mergers & Acquisitions |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Austin, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cleo Capital | Tributary Group |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 2 |
| Total funding | $3.8M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Strategic |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,528 | 84 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cleo Capital | Tributary Group |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 44/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 43/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 27/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (28/100) | F (26/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 7/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cleo Capital | Tributary Group |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
Cleo Capital vs Tributary Group: common questions
Which is better, Cleo Capital or Tributary Group?
On our 0-100 score Tributary Group rates higher (52/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cleo Capital and Tributary Group compare on the numbers?
Cleo Capital leads on headcount (9 against 2), LinkedIn following (6,528 against 84). Tributary Group leads on our overall score (52/100 against 44/100), funding raised ($63.0M against $3.8M).
Read the full Cleo Capital review and pricing or the Tributary Group review and pricing. You can also browse other Cleo Capital alternatives we track.