Cleo Capital vs Seedcamp
Cleo Capital vs Seedcamp, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cleo Capital is on 44/100 and Seedcamp on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Cleo Capital
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Seedcamp
- our overall score: 66/100 against 44/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 25 against 9
- funding raised: $220M against $3.8M
- LinkedIn following: 62,686 against 6,528
At a glance
| Measure | Cleo Capital | Seedcamp |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Venture capital firm focused on early-stage European tech startups. | Europe's first and most active pre-seed and seed fund. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Fintech, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech | Venture Capital, Fintech, Deep Tech, E-commerce |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cleo Capital | Seedcamp |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 25 |
| Total funding | $3.8M | $220M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,528 | 62,686 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cleo Capital | Seedcamp |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 44/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 43/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (28/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cleo Capital | Seedcamp |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Cleo Capital vs Seedcamp: common questions
Which is better, Cleo Capital or Seedcamp?
On our 0-100 score Seedcamp rates higher (66/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cleo Capital and Seedcamp compare on the numbers?
Seedcamp leads on our overall score (66/100 against 44/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 28/100), headcount (25 against 9), funding raised ($220M against $3.8M), LinkedIn following (62,686 against 6,528).
Read the full Cleo Capital review and pricing or the Seedcamp review and pricing. You can also browse other Cleo Capital alternatives we track.