Cleo Capital vs Mayfield
Cleo Capital vs Mayfield, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cleo Capital is on 44/100 and Mayfield on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Cleo Capital
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Mayfield
- our overall score: 62/100 against 44/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 85 against 9
- funding raised: $580M against $3.8M
- LinkedIn following: 29,930 against 6,528
At a glance
| Measure | Cleo Capital | Mayfield |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Venture capital firm focused on early-stage European tech startups. | Early-stage venture capital firm investing in AI-driven startups, emphasizing inception-stage funding and long-term partnerships. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Fintech, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech | Venture Capital, Artificial Intelligence, Early-Stage Investment, AI Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2019 | 1969 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Menlo Park, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cleo Capital | Mayfield |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 85 |
| Total funding | $3.8M | $580M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Fund |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,528 | 29,930 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cleo Capital | Mayfield |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 44/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 43/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (28/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cleo Capital | Mayfield |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Fathom |
Cleo Capital vs Mayfield: common questions
Which is better, Cleo Capital or Mayfield?
On our 0-100 score Mayfield rates higher (62/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cleo Capital and Mayfield compare on the numbers?
Mayfield leads on our overall score (62/100 against 44/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 28/100), headcount (85 against 9), funding raised ($580M against $3.8M), LinkedIn following (29,930 against 6,528).
Read the full Cleo Capital review and pricing or the Mayfield review and pricing. You can also browse other Cleo Capital alternatives we track.