Cledara vs Corcentric
Cledara vs Corcentric, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cledara is on 54/100 and Corcentric on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Cledara
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 45/100
Corcentric
- our overall score: 63/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 63/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 577 against 49
- funding raised: $395M against $24.4M
- LinkedIn following: 66,190 against 15,598
At a glance
| Measure | Cledara | Corcentric |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cledara is a SaaS management platform that helps companies control software subscriptions and spending. | B2B commerce solutions for AP, AR, procurement, and payments. |
| Category | Fintech, Vertical SaaS, SaaS Management, Spend Management | Fintech, Payments, Procurement Software, Accounts Payable Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Cherry Hill, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cledara | Corcentric |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 49 | 577 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.0% |
| Total funding | $24.4M | $395M |
| Latest round | Seed | Credit Facility |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 15,598 | 66,190 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cledara | Corcentric |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cledara | Corcentric |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Cledara vs Corcentric: common questions
Which is better, Cledara or Corcentric?
On our 0-100 score Corcentric rates higher (63/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cledara and Corcentric compare on the numbers?
Cledara leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 45/100). Corcentric leads on our overall score (63/100 against 54/100), domain rating (63/100 against 56/100), headcount (577 against 49), funding raised ($395M against $24.4M), LinkedIn following (66,190 against 15,598).
Read the full Cledara review and pricing or the Corcentric review and pricing. You can also browse other Cledara alternatives we track.