Claybird vs Lightricks
Claybird vs Lightricks, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Claybird is on 13/100 and Lightricks on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Claybird
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Lightricks
- our overall score: 71/100 against 13/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 16/100
- headcount: 554 against 4
At a glance
| Measure | Claybird | Lightricks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The full-stack AI ad company | Jerusalem-based AI creative technology company behind Facetune, Photoleap, and Videoleap, with open-source video generation models (LTX Video) powering next-generation creator workflows. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Video Marketing, Advertising, Agentic AI | Artificial Intelligence, Creative Technology, Generative AI, AI Video Generation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2025 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Jerusalem, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Claybird | Lightricks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4 | 554 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -0.2% |
| Total funding | Not published | $335M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.8B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 33,563 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Claybird | Lightricks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 13/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 7/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 12/100 | 51/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 16/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Claybird | Lightricks |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
Claybird vs Lightricks: common questions
Which is better, Claybird or Lightricks?
On our 0-100 score Lightricks rates higher (71/100 against 13/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Claybird and Lightricks compare on the numbers?
Lightricks leads on our overall score (71/100 against 13/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 32/100), domain rating (72/100 against 16/100), headcount (554 against 4).
Read the full Claybird review and pricing or the Lightricks review and pricing. You can also browse other Claybird alternatives we track.