Classy vs Qgiv
Classy vs Qgiv, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Classy is on 69/100 and Qgiv on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Classy
- our overall score: 69/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 38/100
Qgiv
- headcount: 579 against 201
- LinkedIn following: 23,425 against 5,472
At a glance
| Measure | Classy | Qgiv |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A giving platform that enabled nonprofits to connect supporters with causes, offering peer-to-peer fundraising, events, and direct donations. | Online fundraising and donor management platform for nonprofits. |
| Category | Crowdfunding, Fundraising Platform, Nonprofit Software, Peer-to-Peer Fundraising | Nonprofit Software, Fundraising Software, Donor Management, CRM |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2006 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | San Diego, United States | Tampa, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Classy | Qgiv |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 201 | 579 |
| Total funding | $148M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,472 | 23,425 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Classy | Qgiv |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Classy | Qgiv |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Classy vs Qgiv: common questions
Which is better, Classy or Qgiv?
On our 0-100 score Classy rates higher (69/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Classy and Qgiv compare on the numbers?
Classy leads on our overall score (69/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 38/100). Qgiv leads on headcount (579 against 201), LinkedIn following (23,425 against 5,472).
Read the full Classy review and pricing or the Qgiv review and pricing. You can also browse other Classy alternatives we track.