Classiq vs Oxford Quantum Circuits
Classiq vs Oxford Quantum Circuits, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Classiq is on 61/100 and Oxford Quantum Circuits on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Classiq
- our overall score: 61/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 53/100
Oxford Quantum Circuits
- funding raised: $430M against $195M
- LinkedIn following: 36,202 against 22,493
At a glance
| Measure | Classiq | Oxford Quantum Circuits |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Quantum computing software platform for designing and optimizing quantum circuits. | Building and deploying quantum computers. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Quantum Software, Semiconductor Design Automation, Algorithm Design | Quantum Computing, Deep Tech, Hardware, Cloud Computing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2020 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Oxford, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Classiq | Oxford Quantum Circuits |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 129 | 148 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $195M | $430M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| Valuation | $450M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,493 | 36,202 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Classiq | Oxford Quantum Circuits |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Classiq | Oxford Quantum Circuits |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Classiq vs Oxford Quantum Circuits: common questions
Which is better, Classiq or Oxford Quantum Circuits?
On our 0-100 score Classiq rates higher (61/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Classiq and Oxford Quantum Circuits compare on the numbers?
Classiq leads on our overall score (61/100 against 55/100), domain rating (66/100 against 53/100). Oxford Quantum Circuits leads on funding raised ($430M against $195M), LinkedIn following (36,202 against 22,493).
Read the full Classiq review and pricing or the Oxford Quantum Circuits review and pricing. You can also browse other Classiq alternatives we track.