Claroty vs Shield-IoT
Claroty vs Shield-IoT, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Claroty is on 74/100 and Shield-IoT on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Claroty
- our overall score: 74/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 842 against 15
- headcount growth: +22.4% against -9.7%
- funding raised: $737M against $11.0M
- LinkedIn following: 64,458 against 1,223
Shield-IoT
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Claroty | Shield-IoT |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Claroty is an industrial cybersecurity platform that protects operational technology, IoT, and medical device networks from cyber threats. | Cybersecurity and analytics for mass-scale B2B IoT and IIoT networks. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, IoMT Security, IoT Security | Smart City, Cybersecurity, Automotive, Industry 4.0 |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Claroty | Shield-IoT |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 842 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +22.4% | -9.7% |
| Total funding | $737M | $11.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series A |
| Valuation | $2.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 64,458 | 1,223 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Claroty | Shield-IoT |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (29/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Claroty | Shield-IoT |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
Claroty vs Shield-IoT: common questions
Which is better, Claroty or Shield-IoT?
On our 0-100 score Claroty rates higher (74/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Claroty and Shield-IoT compare on the numbers?
Claroty leads on our overall score (74/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 29/100), domain rating (75/100 against 30/100), headcount (842 against 15), headcount growth (+22.4% against -9.7%), funding raised ($737M against $11.0M), LinkedIn following (64,458 against 1,223).
Read the full Claroty review and pricing or the Shield-IoT review and pricing. You can also browse other Claroty alternatives we track.

