Claroty vs SCADAfence
Claroty vs SCADAfence, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Claroty is on 74/100 and SCADAfence on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Claroty
- our overall score: 74/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 842 against 29
- headcount growth: +22.4% against -20.6%
- funding raised: $737M against $26.0M
- LinkedIn following: 64,458 against 9,190
SCADAfence
- domain rating: 88/100 against 75/100
At a glance
| Measure | Claroty | SCADAfence |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Claroty is an industrial cybersecurity platform that protects operational technology, IoT, and medical device networks from cyber threats. | Industrial cybersecurity and OT/IoT solutions for critical infrastructure and manufacturing. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, IoMT Security, IoT Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | services |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Claroty | SCADAfence |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 842 | 29 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +22.4% | -20.6% |
| Total funding | $737M | $26.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $2.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 64,458 | 9,190 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Claroty | SCADAfence |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Claroty | SCADAfence |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Azure |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk, HubSpot | Not detected |
Claroty vs SCADAfence: common questions
Which is better, Claroty or SCADAfence?
On our 0-100 score Claroty rates higher (74/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Claroty and SCADAfence compare on the numbers?
Claroty leads on our overall score (74/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 40/100), headcount (842 against 29), headcount growth (+22.4% against -20.6%), funding raised ($737M against $26.0M), LinkedIn following (64,458 against 9,190). SCADAfence leads on domain rating (88/100 against 75/100).
Read the full Claroty review and pricing or the SCADAfence review and pricing. You can also browse other Claroty alternatives we track.