Claroty vs QIS Risk
Claroty vs QIS Risk, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Claroty is on 74/100 and QIS Risk on 5/100.
Where each one leads
Claroty
- our overall score: 74/100 against 5/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 4/100
QIS Risk
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Claroty | QIS Risk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Claroty is an industrial cybersecurity platform that protects operational technology, IoT, and medical device networks from cyber threats. | QIS Risk provides quantum-resistant cybersecurity solutions for financial institutions. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, IoMT Security, IoT Security | Cybersecurity, Quantum Computing, Fintech, Cryptography |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | Not published |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Claroty | QIS Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 842 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +22.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $737M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series F | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 64,458 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Claroty | QIS Risk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 5/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 86/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 4/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Claroty | QIS Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
Claroty vs QIS Risk: common questions
Which is better, Claroty or QIS Risk?
On our 0-100 score Claroty rates higher (74/100 against 5/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Claroty and QIS Risk compare on the numbers?
Claroty leads on our overall score (74/100 against 5/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 21/100), domain rating (75/100 against 4/100).
Read the full Claroty review and pricing or the QIS Risk review and pricing. You can also browse other Claroty alternatives we track.