Claroty vs Galvanick
Claroty vs Galvanick, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Claroty is on 74/100 and Galvanick on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Claroty
- our overall score: 74/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 842 against 23
- funding raised: $737M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 64,458 against 1,975
Galvanick
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Claroty | Galvanick |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Claroty is an industrial cybersecurity platform that protects operational technology, IoT, and medical device networks from cyber threats. | Industrial cybersecurity startup providing threat detection to secure critical manufacturing and infrastructure. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, IoMT Security, IoT Security | Cybersecurity, Industrial, Manufacturing, Defense |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Seattle, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Claroty | Galvanick |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 842 | 23 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +22.4% | Not published |
| Open roles | Not published | 5 |
| Total funding | $737M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Seed |
| Valuation | $2.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 64,458 | 1,975 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Claroty | Galvanick |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 37/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Claroty | Galvanick |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Claroty vs Galvanick: common questions
Which is better, Claroty or Galvanick?
On our 0-100 score Claroty rates higher (74/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Claroty and Galvanick compare on the numbers?
Claroty leads on our overall score (74/100 against 46/100), domain rating (75/100 against 37/100), headcount (842 against 23), funding raised ($737M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (64,458 against 1,975).
Read the full Claroty review and pricing or the Galvanick review and pricing. You can also browse other Claroty alternatives we track.