Claroty vs Field Effect
Claroty vs Field Effect, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Claroty is on 74/100 and Field Effect on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Claroty
- our overall score: 74/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 66/100
- headcount: 842 against 150
- LinkedIn following: 64,458 against 6,696
Field Effect
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Claroty | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Claroty is an industrial cybersecurity platform that protects operational technology, IoT, and medical device networks from cyber threats. | Cybersecurity platform for operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, IoMT Security, IoT Security | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, OT Security, ICS Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Ottawa, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Claroty | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 842 | 150 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +22.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $737M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series F | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 64,458 | 6,696 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Claroty | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Claroty | Field Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot, Freshdesk |
Claroty vs Field Effect: common questions
Which is better, Claroty or Field Effect?
On our 0-100 score Claroty rates higher (74/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Claroty and Field Effect compare on the numbers?
Claroty leads on our overall score (74/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 37/100), domain rating (75/100 against 66/100), headcount (842 against 150), LinkedIn following (64,458 against 6,696).
Read the full Claroty review and pricing or the Field Effect review and pricing. You can also browse other Claroty alternatives we track.