CJ Affiliate vs Reacher
CJ Affiliate vs Reacher, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CJ Affiliate is on 75/100 and Reacher on 47/100.
Where each one leads
CJ Affiliate
- our overall score: 75/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 85/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 1,801 against 23
- LinkedIn following: 49,398 against 3,670
Reacher
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 37/100
At a glance
| Measure | CJ Affiliate | Reacher |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global affiliate marketing platform connecting brands with publishers for performance-based growth. | Reacher automates affiliate marketing for enterprise brands, replacing teams of 5+ people with AI-powered creator discovery, outreach, and management. |
| Category | Affiliate Marketing, Performance Marketing, AdTech, Marketing Tech | Creator Marketing Automation, Creator Economy, MarTech, AdTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 1998 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Santa Barbara, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CJ Affiliate | Reacher |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,801 | 23 |
| Open roles | Not published | 8 |
| LinkedIn followers | 49,398 | 3,670 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CJ Affiliate | Reacher |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 75/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 14/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 47/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 85/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CJ Affiliate | Reacher |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Plausible |
Product and pricing
| Measure | CJ Affiliate | Reacher |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI-Powered Creator Discovery, Automated Outreach & Management, Enterprise Affiliate Marketing Automation, Curated Creator Marketplace, AI-Guided Creator Deals |
CJ Affiliate vs Reacher: common questions
Which is better, CJ Affiliate or Reacher?
On our 0-100 score CJ Affiliate rates higher (75/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CJ Affiliate and Reacher compare on the numbers?
CJ Affiliate leads on our overall score (75/100 against 47/100), domain rating (85/100 against 34/100), headcount (1,801 against 23), LinkedIn following (49,398 against 3,670). Reacher leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 37/100).
Read the full CJ Affiliate review and pricing or the Reacher review and pricing. You can also browse other CJ Affiliate alternatives we track.