CiValue vs Wandz.ai
CiValue vs Wandz.ai, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CiValue is on 57/100 and Wandz.ai on 61/100.
Where each one leads
CiValue
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 25/100
- LinkedIn following: 43,689 against 14,982
Wandz.ai
- our overall score: 61/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 81/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 101 against 50
- funding raised: $86.0M against $16.0M
At a glance
| Measure | CiValue | Wandz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ciValue provides high-frequency retailers with cloud-based customer analytics and personalized recommendations using predictive data science. | AB Tasty provides a unified platform for experimentation, personalization, and feature management to optimize customer experiences. |
| Category | Retail, Analytics, Customer Intelligence, RetailTech | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Web Security, E-commerce |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CiValue | Wandz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 50 | 101 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -60.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $16.0M | $86.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 43,689 | 14,982 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CiValue | Wandz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CiValue | Wandz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
CiValue vs Wandz.ai: common questions
Which is better, CiValue or Wandz.ai?
On our 0-100 score Wandz.ai rates higher (61/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CiValue and Wandz.ai compare on the numbers?
CiValue leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 25/100), LinkedIn following (43,689 against 14,982). Wandz.ai leads on our overall score (61/100 against 57/100), domain rating (81/100 against 42/100), headcount (101 against 50), funding raised ($86.0M against $16.0M).
Read the full CiValue review and pricing or the Wandz.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other CiValue alternatives we track.