CiValue vs Deqa
CiValue vs Deqa, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CiValue is on 57/100 and Deqa on 35/100.
Where each one leads
CiValue
- our overall score: 57/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 50 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 43,689 against 35
Deqa
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CiValue | Deqa |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ciValue provides high-frequency retailers with cloud-based customer analytics and personalized recommendations using predictive data science. | Deqa provides Amazon sellers with tools to discover and launch winning products before competitors. |
| Category | Retail, Analytics, Customer Intelligence, RetailTech | Amazon, E-commerce, Marketplace Tools, Amazon FBA |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CiValue | Deqa |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 50 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -60.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $16.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 43,689 | 35 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CiValue | Deqa |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 35/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 7/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 18/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | Not published |
CiValue vs Deqa: common questions
Which is better, CiValue or Deqa?
On our 0-100 score CiValue rates higher (57/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CiValue and Deqa compare on the numbers?
CiValue leads on our overall score (57/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 22/100), headcount (50 against 2), LinkedIn following (43,689 against 35).
Read the full CiValue review and pricing or the Deqa review and pricing. You can also browse other CiValue alternatives we track.