CiValue vs Qurate.tech
CiValue vs Qurate.tech, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CiValue is on 57/100 and Qurate.tech on 17/100.
Where each one leads
CiValue
- our overall score: 57/100 against 17/100
- domain rating: 42/100 against 6/100
- headcount: 50 against 4
- LinkedIn following: 43,689 against 336
Qurate.tech
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CiValue | Qurate.tech |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ciValue provides high-frequency retailers with cloud-based customer analytics and personalized recommendations using predictive data science. | AI and big data platform personalizing DIY, cooking, and crafting retail experiences. |
| Category | Retail, Analytics, Customer Intelligence, RetailTech | Recommendation Engine, Retail, Food, ML |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CiValue | Qurate.tech |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 50 | 4 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -60.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $16.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 43,689 | 336 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CiValue | Qurate.tech |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 17/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 7/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | 6/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CiValue | Qurate.tech |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
CiValue vs Qurate.tech: common questions
Which is better, CiValue or Qurate.tech?
On our 0-100 score CiValue rates higher (57/100 against 17/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CiValue and Qurate.tech compare on the numbers?
CiValue leads on our overall score (57/100 against 17/100), domain rating (42/100 against 6/100), headcount (50 against 4), LinkedIn following (43,689 against 336).
Read the full CiValue review and pricing or the Qurate.tech review and pricing. You can also browse other CiValue alternatives we track.