Cityradar vs Foursquare
Cityradar vs Foursquare, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cityradar is on 10/100 and Foursquare on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Cityradar
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Foursquare
- our overall score: 68/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 5/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cityradar | Foursquare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CityRadar turns official city open data into evidence-backed signals about new and changing local businesses for B2B service providers. | Location intelligence platform providing geospatial data and tools for businesses. |
| Category | Data Analytics, Business Intelligence, Local Business Data, Open Data | Location Intelligence, Geospatial Data, Data Platform, MarTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Not published | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cityradar | Foursquare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 525 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +5.7% |
| Total funding | Not published | $334M |
| Latest round | Not published | Late Stage |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 89,590 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cityradar | Foursquare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 10/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 5/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cityradar | Foursquare |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager, Segment |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Cityradar vs Foursquare: common questions
Which is better, Cityradar or Foursquare?
On our 0-100 score Foursquare rates higher (68/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cityradar and Foursquare compare on the numbers?
Foursquare leads on our overall score (68/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 41/100), domain rating (91/100 against 5/100).
Read the full Cityradar review and pricing or the Foursquare review and pricing. You can also browse other Cityradar alternatives we track.