Citymapper vs HQ
Citymapper vs HQ, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Citymapper is on 58/100 and HQ on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Citymapper
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 29/100
- funding raised: $109M against $12.0M
HQ
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Citymapper | HQ |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A public transit app and mapping service providing real-time transport options across cities. | Enterprise solution for corporate ground transportation booking, billing, and payment. |
| Category | Mobility, Public Transit, Mapping Service, Urban Planning | Mobility, Ride Service, Route Optimization, Travel Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Citymapper | HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 174 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +29.6% |
| Total funding | $109M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Strategic |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 7,485 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Citymapper | HQ |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 7/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Citymapper | HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Segment | Not detected |
Citymapper vs HQ: common questions
Which is better, Citymapper or HQ?
On our 0-100 score Citymapper rates higher (58/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Citymapper and HQ compare on the numbers?
Citymapper leads on agent readiness (59/100 against 50/100), domain rating (79/100 against 29/100), funding raised ($109M against $12.0M).
Read the full Citymapper review and pricing or the HQ review and pricing. You can also browse other Citymapper alternatives we track.