Cisco vs Wind River
Cisco vs Wind River, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Wind River on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 65/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 75/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 2,429
- funding raised: $220B against $8.8B
Wind River
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Wind River |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | A global leader in delivering software for mission-critical intelligent systems at the edge. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Embedded Systems, Edge Computing, Internet of Things (IoT), Real-Time Operating Systems |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 1984 | 1981 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Alameda, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Wind River |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 2,429 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | $8.8B |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Wind River |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 12/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Wind River |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Khoros | Not detected |
Cisco vs Wind River: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Wind River?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 65/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Wind River compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 65/100), domain rating (91/100 against 75/100), headcount (95,924 against 2,429), funding raised ($220B against $8.8B).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Wind River review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.