Cisco vs Ubicquia
Cisco vs Ubicquia, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Ubicquia on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 49/100
- funding raised: $220B against $136M
Ubicquia
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Ubicquia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Intelligent infrastructure solutions provider |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Intelligent Infrastructure, IoT, Smart Cities, Utilities |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 1984 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Melbourne, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Ubicquia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | $136M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Ubicquia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Ubicquia |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Astro |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Khoros | Not detected |
Cisco vs Ubicquia: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Ubicquia?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Ubicquia compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 49/100), domain rating (91/100 against 49/100), funding raised ($220B against $136M).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Ubicquia review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.