Cisco vs Total Uptime
Cisco vs Total Uptime, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Total Uptime on 2/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 2/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 16
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 833
Total Uptime
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Total Uptime |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Simplify application delivery with managed cloud or self-hosted solutions for load balancing, security, DNS, and high availability. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Application Delivery, Cloud Services, Load Balancing, DNS Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 1984 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Asheville, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Total Uptime |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 16 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 833 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Total Uptime |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 2/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 99/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Total Uptime |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Khoros | Not detected |
Cisco vs Total Uptime: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Total Uptime?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 2/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Total Uptime compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 2/100), domain rating (91/100 against 55/100), headcount (95,924 against 16), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 833).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Total Uptime review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.