Cisco vs Tata Communications
Cisco vs Tata Communications, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Tata Communications on 20/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 20/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 75/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 16,877
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 791,313
Tata Communications
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 48/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Tata Communications |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | A global digital ecosystem enabler providing a comprehensive portfolio of connectivity, collaboration, cloud, mobility, and security services to enterprises worldwide. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Telecom Infrastructure, Cloud Infrastructure, Managed Security Services, Unified Communications |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Services |
| Founded | 1984 | 1986 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Mumbai, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Tata Communications |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 16,877 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 791,313 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Tata Communications |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Tata Communications |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Khoros | Not detected |
Cisco vs Tata Communications: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Tata Communications?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Tata Communications compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 20/100), domain rating (91/100 against 75/100), headcount (95,924 against 16,877), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 791,313). Tata Communications leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 48/100).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Tata Communications review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.