Cisco vs Perimeter 81
Cisco vs Perimeter 81, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Perimeter 81 on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 69/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 97
- headcount growth: +4.2% against -26.3%
- funding raised: $220B against $155M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 33,562
Perimeter 81
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Converged networking and cybersecurity platform for secure remote and office access to all resources. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Network, Network Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 1984 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 97 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | -26.3% |
| Total funding | $220B | $155M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| Valuation | $240B | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 33,562 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Perimeter 81 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Khoros | Intercom, Freshdesk |
Cisco vs Perimeter 81: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Perimeter 81?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 69/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Perimeter 81 compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 69/100), headcount (95,924 against 97), headcount growth (+4.2% against -26.3%), funding raised ($220B against $155M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 33,562).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Perimeter 81 review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.