Cisco vs Parallel Wireless
Cisco vs Parallel Wireless, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Parallel Wireless on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 49/100
- funding raised: $220B against $75.0M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 89,649
Parallel Wireless
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Parallel Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Parallel Wireless is a leading OpenRAN company providing cloud-native 5G/4G/3G/2G OpenRAN architecture for mobile operators. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | OpenRAN, 5G, 4G, 3G |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 1984 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Nashua, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Parallel Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Open roles | Not published | 35 |
| Total funding | $220B | $75.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 89,649 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Parallel Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Parallel Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Khoros | Not detected |
Cisco vs Parallel Wireless: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Parallel Wireless?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Parallel Wireless compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 54/100), domain rating (91/100 against 49/100), funding raised ($220B against $75.0M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 89,649).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Parallel Wireless review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.