Cisco vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings
Cisco vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 22,232
- funding raised: $220B against $55.0M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 1,908,870
Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Cybersecurity solutions for network, cloud, and hybrid workforces, leveraging threat intelligence and consulting. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Cybersecurity, Network Security, Cloud Security, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 1984 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | תל אביב - יפו, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 22,232 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | $55.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 1,908,870 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| Support stack | Khoros | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cisco vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 47/100), headcount (95,924 against 22,232), funding raised ($220B against $55.0M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 1,908,870).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.