Cisco vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
Cisco vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR on 23/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 23/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 22,024
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 1,898,990
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Integrated endpoint, network, and cloud security platform for threat detection and response. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 1984 | Not published |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Santa Clara, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 22,024 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 1,898,990 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 23/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| Support stack | Khoros | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cisco vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 23/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 23/100), headcount (95,924 against 22,024), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 1,898,990).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.