Cisco vs Mondoo
Cisco vs Mondoo, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Mondoo on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 47
- funding raised: $220B against $169M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 4,748
Mondoo
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Mondoo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Agentic vulnerability management platform that eliminates vulnerabilities using AI. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Cybersecurity, Vulnerability Management, AI, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 1984 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Mondoo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 47 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | $169M |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 4,748 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Mondoo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 99/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Mondoo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Khoros | Intercom |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cisco vs Mondoo: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Mondoo?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Mondoo compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 50/100), domain rating (91/100 against 58/100), headcount (95,924 against 47), funding raised ($220B against $169M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 4,748).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Mondoo review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.