Cisco vs IBM Security
Cisco vs IBM Security, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and IBM Security on 24/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 24/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 31/100
IBM Security
- headcount: 330,113 against 95,924
- LinkedIn following: 19,595,236 against 7,660,767
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | IBM Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | IBM's comprehensive suite of cybersecurity products and services for businesses. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 1984 | Not published |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Armonk, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | IBM Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 330,113 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 19,595,236 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | IBM Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 24/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 20/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | IBM Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Khoros | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Cisco | IBM Security |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 2 negative across 6 threads |
“Met the CTO of IBM Security America. I’ve never been an employee of IBM or even know anyone who is. However, I talked to him for nearly an hour and he was genuinely one of the nicest most humble guys I’ve ever met.”r/IBM
Cisco vs IBM Security: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or IBM Security?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 24/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and IBM Security compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 24/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 31/100). IBM Security leads on headcount (330,113 against 95,924), LinkedIn following (19,595,236 against 7,660,767).
What do real users say about Cisco and IBM Security?
IBM Security: 1 positive and 2 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/IBM.
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the IBM Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.