Cisco vs Forescout
Cisco vs Forescout, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Forescout on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 61/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 76/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 1,341
- funding raised: $220B against $123M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 71,860
Forescout
- headcount growth: +12.4% against +4.2%
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Forescout |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Enterprise of Things cybersecurity platform for identifying, segmenting, and enforcing compliance of connected devices. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, IoT, Industrial |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 1984 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Forescout |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 1,341 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | +12.4% |
| Total funding | $220B | $123M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series F |
| Valuation | $240B | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 71,860 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Forescout |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Forescout |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
Cisco vs Forescout: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Forescout?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Forescout compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 61/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 21/100), domain rating (91/100 against 76/100), headcount (95,924 against 1,341), funding raised ($220B against $123M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 71,860). Forescout leads on headcount growth (+12.4% against +4.2%).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Forescout review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.