Cisco vs F5
Cisco vs F5, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and F5 on 17/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 17/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 6,500
F5
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | F5 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Global leader in application security and delivery for hybrid and multicloud environments. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Cybersecurity, Cloud Computing, Networking, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 1984 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Seattle, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | F5 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 6,500 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | F5 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 17/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 6/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 93/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | F5 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Support stack | Khoros | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cisco vs F5: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or F5?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 17/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and F5 compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 17/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 41/100), headcount (95,924 against 6,500).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the F5 review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.