Cisco vs Extreme Networks
Cisco vs Extreme Networks, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Extreme Networks on 8/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 8/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 77/100
Extreme Networks
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Extreme Networks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | AI-driven networking solutions for enterprises. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Networking, Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Software, Cloud Computing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 1984 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Durham, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Extreme Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Extreme Networks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 8/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 9/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Extreme Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks | Not detected | Aspnet |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Khoros | Khoros |
Cisco vs Extreme Networks: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Extreme Networks?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 8/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Extreme Networks compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 8/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 38/100), domain rating (91/100 against 77/100).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Extreme Networks review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.