Cisco vs Effect Photonics
Cisco vs Effect Photonics, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Effect Photonics on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 60/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 76
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 15,056
Effect Photonics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Effect Photonics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Develops highly integrated optical communication products using photonic chip technology for data centers and edge networks. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Semiconductor Manufacturing, Optical Communications, Photonics, Data Center Interconnects |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 1984 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Eindhoven, Netherlands |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Effect Photonics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 76 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 15,056 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Effect Photonics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Effect Photonics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Support stack | Khoros | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cisco vs Effect Photonics: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Effect Photonics?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Effect Photonics compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 60/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 22/100), domain rating (91/100 against 47/100), headcount (95,924 against 76), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 15,056).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Effect Photonics review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.