Cisco vs EdgeQ
Cisco vs EdgeQ, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and EdgeQ on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 62/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 23/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 124
- funding raised: $220B against $114M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 8,327
EdgeQ
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | EdgeQ |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Provider of 5G and AI solutions on a single chip for edge networks. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | 5G, AI Chip, Edge Computing, Semiconductor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 1984 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Santa Clara, Greece |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | EdgeQ |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 124 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | $114M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 8,327 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | EdgeQ |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (23/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | EdgeQ |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| Support stack | Not detected | Freshdesk |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cisco vs EdgeQ: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or EdgeQ?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and EdgeQ compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 62/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 23/100), domain rating (91/100 against 41/100), headcount (95,924 against 124), funding raised ($220B against $114M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 8,327).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the EdgeQ review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.