Cisco vs Eclipse Foundation
Cisco vs Eclipse Foundation, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Eclipse Foundation on 10/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 37/100
Eclipse Foundation
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Eclipse Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | A non-profit organization stewarding open source software projects, communities, and collaborative industry ecosystems. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Open Source, Software Development, IoT, Cloud Computing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 1984 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Brussels, Belgium |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Eclipse Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Eclipse Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 10/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 89/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Eclipse Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Cisco vs Eclipse Foundation: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Eclipse Foundation?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Eclipse Foundation compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 37/100).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Eclipse Foundation review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.