Cisco vs e-peas
Cisco vs e-peas, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and e-peas on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 49
- funding raised: $220B against $19.2M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 6,964
e-peas
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | e-peas |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Ultra-low-power energy harvesting and power management solutions for autonomous electronics. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Semiconductors, Internet of Things (IoT), Energy Harvesting, Power Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 1984 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | e-peas |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 49 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | $19.2M |
| Latest round | Seed | Growth |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 6,964 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | e-peas |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | e-peas |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
Cisco vs e-peas: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or e-peas?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and e-peas compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 21/100), domain rating (91/100 against 51/100), headcount (95,924 against 49), funding raised ($220B against $19.2M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 6,964).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the e-peas review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.