Cisco vs Density
Cisco vs Density, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Density on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 61/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 63
- funding raised: $220B against $199M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 11,188
Density
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Density |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Density provides hardware and software for measuring and optimizing physical space utilization. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Workplace Analytics, Smart Building Technology, Space Management, IoT |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware, software, platform |
| Founded | 1984 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Density |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | 63 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | $199M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | $240B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | 11,188 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Density |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Density |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Khoros | Not detected |
Cisco vs Density: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Density?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Density compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 61/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 41/100), domain rating (91/100 against 60/100), headcount (95,924 against 63), funding raised ($220B against $199M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 11,188).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Density review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.