Cisco vs Crypta Labs
Cisco vs Crypta Labs, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cisco is on 83/100 and Crypta Labs on 39/100.
Where each one leads
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 30/100
- funding raised: $220B against $3.4M
Crypta Labs
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cisco | Crypta Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions | Developer of quantum-safe hardware security modules and QRNG technology for critical infrastructure and IoT. |
| Category | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity | Cybersecurity, Quantum Technology, IoT, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B Hardware / SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 1984 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cisco | Crypta Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 95,924 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220B | $3.4M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| Valuation | $240B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,660,767 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cisco | Crypta Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 39/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 33/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 10/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cisco | Crypta Labs |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
Cisco vs Crypta Labs: common questions
Which is better, Cisco or Crypta Labs?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cisco and Crypta Labs compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 39/100), domain rating (91/100 against 30/100), funding raised ($220B against $3.4M).
Read the full Cisco review and pricing or the Crypta Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other Cisco alternatives we track.