Circulor vs Xpansiv
Circulor vs Xpansiv, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Circulor is on 50/100 and Xpansiv on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Circulor
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Xpansiv
- our overall score: 57/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 250 against 32
- funding raised: $100M against $33.5M
- LinkedIn following: 16,059 against 4,170
At a glance
| Measure | Circulor | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides supply chain traceability and sustainability solutions using blockchain technology. | Global commodity data and analytics platform for ESG and energy markets. |
| Category | Supply Chain Traceability, Sustainability, Blockchain, Critical Minerals | Climate Tech, Energy, Commodity Data, ESG |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Circulor | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 32 | 250 |
| Total funding | $33.5M | $100M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,170 | 16,059 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Circulor | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Circulor | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Azure |
| CDN | Netlify | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Circulor vs Xpansiv: common questions
Which is better, Circulor or Xpansiv?
On our 0-100 score Xpansiv rates higher (57/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Circulor and Xpansiv compare on the numbers?
Xpansiv leads on our overall score (57/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (43/100 against 37/100), domain rating (68/100 against 61/100), headcount (250 against 32), funding raised ($100M against $33.5M), LinkedIn following (16,059 against 4,170).
Read the full Circulor review and pricing or the Xpansiv review and pricing. You can also browse other Circulor alternatives we track.