Circulor vs Redwood Materials
Circulor vs Redwood Materials, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Circulor is on 50/100 and Redwood Materials on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Circulor
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Redwood Materials
- our overall score: 59/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 773 against 32
- funding raised: $1.1B against $33.5M
- LinkedIn following: 78,725 against 4,170
At a glance
| Measure | Circulor | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides supply chain traceability and sustainability solutions using blockchain technology. | Recycling and refining battery materials for electric vehicles and energy storage. |
| Category | Supply Chain Traceability, Sustainability, Blockchain, Critical Minerals | Battery Technology, Energy Storage, EV Charging, Climate Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Carson City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Circulor | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 32 | 773 |
| Total funding | $33.5M | $1.1B |
| Latest round | Series B | Series E |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,170 | 78,725 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Circulor | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Circulor | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Nuxt |
Circulor vs Redwood Materials: common questions
Which is better, Circulor or Redwood Materials?
On our 0-100 score Redwood Materials rates higher (59/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Circulor and Redwood Materials compare on the numbers?
Redwood Materials leads on our overall score (59/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 37/100), headcount (773 against 32), funding raised ($1.1B against $33.5M), LinkedIn following (78,725 against 4,170).
Read the full Circulor review and pricing or the Redwood Materials review and pricing. You can also browse other Circulor alternatives we track.