Circular11 vs Cylib
Circular11 vs Cylib, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Circular11 is on 46/100 and Cylib on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Circular11
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cylib
- our overall score: 61/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 26/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 129 against 9
- funding raised: $66.6M against $2.9M
- LinkedIn following: 17,840 against 1,311
At a glance
| Measure | Circular11 | Cylib |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Turning low-grade plastic waste into building materials and home products. | Revolutionizing battery recycling for a circular future in Europe. |
| Category | Waste Management, Construction, Materials Science, Sustainability | Battery Recycling, Circular Economy, Deep Tech, Materials Science |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Services |
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Dorset, United Kingdom | Germany, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Circular11 | Cylib |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 129 |
| Total funding | $2.9M | $66.6M |
| Latest round | Equity Funding | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,311 | 17,840 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Circular11 | Cylib |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 42/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | 46/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Circular11 | Cylib |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Jetpack Stats | Not detected |
Circular11 vs Cylib: common questions
Which is better, Circular11 or Cylib?
On our 0-100 score Cylib rates higher (61/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Circular11 and Cylib compare on the numbers?
Cylib leads on our overall score (61/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 26/100), domain rating (46/100 against 26/100), headcount (129 against 9), funding raised ($66.6M against $2.9M), LinkedIn following (17,840 against 1,311).
Read the full Circular11 review and pricing or the Cylib review and pricing. You can also browse other Circular11 alternatives we track.