Circular Genomics vs deTechGene
Circular Genomics vs deTechGene, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Circular Genomics is on 40/100 and deTechGene on 33/100.
Where each one leads
Circular Genomics
- our overall score: 40/100 against 33/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 21/100
- funding raised: $19.5M against $3.5M
- LinkedIn following: 6,665 against 2,135
deTechGene
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Circular Genomics | deTechGene |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing advanced genomic sequencing technologies for personalized medicine and research. | deTechGene is a startup focused on developing advanced genetic analysis tools and platforms. |
| Category | Genomics, Biotech, HealthTech, DNA Data Storage | Genomics, Biotech, HealthTech, Drug Discovery |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Technology | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Jerusalem, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Circular Genomics | deTechGene |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 17 |
| Total funding | $19.5M | $3.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Pre-Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,665 | 2,135 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Circular Genomics | deTechGene |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 33/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 22/100 | 23/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Circular Genomics | deTechGene |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Circular Genomics vs deTechGene: common questions
Which is better, Circular Genomics or deTechGene?
On our 0-100 score Circular Genomics rates higher (40/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Circular Genomics and deTechGene compare on the numbers?
Circular Genomics leads on our overall score (40/100 against 33/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 21/100), funding raised ($19.5M against $3.5M), LinkedIn following (6,665 against 2,135).
Read the full Circular Genomics review and pricing or the deTechGene review and pricing. You can also browse other Circular Genomics alternatives we track.