Circadence vs Kiteworks
Circadence vs Kiteworks, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Circadence is on 45/100 and Kiteworks on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Circadence
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Kiteworks
- our overall score: 61/100 against 45/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 77/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 362 against 76
- funding raised: $588M against $16.4M
At a glance
| Measure | Circadence | Kiteworks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A cybersecurity company focused on protecting sensitive data through advanced encryption and privacy-preserving technologies. | Securely manages sensitive content communications across email, file sharing, and APIs for enterprises. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Data Privacy, Software, SaaS | Cybersecurity, Secure Content Communication, Data Governance, Compliance Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Boulder, United States | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Circadence | Kiteworks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 76 | 362 |
| Total funding | $16.4M | $588M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 49,302 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Circadence | Kiteworks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 9/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Circadence | Kiteworks |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
Circadence vs Kiteworks: common questions
Which is better, Circadence or Kiteworks?
On our 0-100 score Kiteworks rates higher (61/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Circadence and Kiteworks compare on the numbers?
Kiteworks leads on our overall score (61/100 against 45/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 39/100), domain rating (77/100 against 50/100), headcount (362 against 76), funding raised ($588M against $16.4M).
Read the full Circadence review and pricing or the Kiteworks review and pricing. You can also browse other Circadence alternatives we track.