Ciphersec vs RunSybil
Ciphersec vs RunSybil, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ciphersec is on 23/100 and RunSybil on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Ciphersec
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
RunSybil
- our overall score: 55/100 against 23/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 28 against 15
At a glance
| Measure | Ciphersec | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Plateforme de pentest automatisé | RunSybil offers an AI-driven pentester that automates hacker intuition to find vulnerabilities, aiming to drive down the speed and cost of vulnerability discovery to zero. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Management, Security Automation | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Penetration Testing, AI-driven Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2023 |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ciphersec | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 28 |
| Total funding | Not published | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Unknown |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 2,720 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ciphersec | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 23/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 12/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 44/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ciphersec | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Bootstrap | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Ciphersec | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI-driven pentesting, Rapid onboarding, Attack replay, Test transparency, Integrations |
What users say
| Measure | Ciphersec | RunSybil |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 3 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“RunSybil. discussion of the automated offensive security testing platform RunSybil (www.runsybil.com)”r/
Ciphersec vs RunSybil: common questions
Which is better, Ciphersec or RunSybil?
On our 0-100 score RunSybil rates higher (55/100 against 23/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ciphersec and RunSybil compare on the numbers?
RunSybil leads on our overall score (55/100 against 23/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 37/100), headcount (28 against 15).
What do real users say about Ciphersec and RunSybil?
RunSybil: 3 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full Ciphersec review and pricing or the RunSybil review and pricing. You can also browse other Ciphersec alternatives we track.