CipherHealth vs Luma Health
CipherHealth vs Luma Health, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CipherHealth is on 54/100 and Luma Health on 56/100.
Where each one leads
CipherHealth
- domain rating: 54/100 against 43/100
Luma Health
- funding raised: $130M against $10.0M
At a glance
| Measure | CipherHealth | Luma Health |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered patient engagement platform for healthcare providers. | AI-powered platform automating patient journeys and healthcare operations. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Patient Engagement, Care Coordination | HealthTech, Patient Engagement, Operational AI, Healthcare Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Austin, United States | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CipherHealth | Luma Health |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 106 | Not published |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $130M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 11,741 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CipherHealth | Luma Health |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 40/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 73/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 43/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CipherHealth | Luma Health |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
CipherHealth vs Luma Health: common questions
Which is better, CipherHealth or Luma Health?
On our 0-100 score Luma Health rates higher (56/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CipherHealth and Luma Health compare on the numbers?
CipherHealth leads on domain rating (54/100 against 43/100). Luma Health leads on funding raised ($130M against $10.0M).
Read the full CipherHealth review and pricing or the Luma Health review and pricing. You can also browse other CipherHealth alternatives we track.