Cider Security vs Tracebit
Cider Security vs Tracebit, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cider Security is on 57/100 and Tracebit on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Cider Security
- our overall score: 57/100 against 50/100
- funding raised: $38.0M against $25.0M
Tracebit
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 56/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 34 against 9
At a glance
| Measure | Cider Security | Tracebit |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AppSec operating system for end-to-end CI/CD security orchestration. | Cloud-native cybersecurity company focused on threat detection using deception technology. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, AppSec, CI/CD | Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Deception Technology, SaaS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cider Security | Tracebit |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -28.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $38.0M | $25.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| Valuation | $192M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,566 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cider Security | Tracebit |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 7/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cider Security | Tracebit |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cider Security vs Tracebit: common questions
Which is better, Cider Security or Tracebit?
On our 0-100 score Cider Security rates higher (57/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cider Security and Tracebit compare on the numbers?
Cider Security leads on our overall score (57/100 against 50/100), funding raised ($38.0M against $25.0M). Tracebit leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 22/100), domain rating (56/100 against 42/100), headcount (34 against 9).
Read the full Cider Security review and pricing or the Tracebit review and pricing. You can also browse other Cider Security alternatives we track.