Cider Security vs Noname Security
Cider Security vs Noname Security, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cider Security is on 57/100 and Noname Security on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Cider Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Noname Security
- our overall score: 68/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 25/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 380 against 9
- headcount growth: +1.2% against -28.9%
- funding raised: $225M against $38.0M
- LinkedIn following: 19,031 against 1,566
At a glance
| Measure | Cider Security | Noname Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AppSec operating system for end-to-end CI/CD security orchestration. | Comprehensive API security platform for proactive posture management, runtime security, and testing. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, AppSec, CI/CD | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, API, Data Leakage Prevention |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cider Security | Noname Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 380 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -28.9% | +1.2% |
| Total funding | $38.0M | $225M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| Valuation | $192M | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,566 | 19,031 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cider Security | Noname Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 40/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cider Security | Noname Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Azure |
Cider Security vs Noname Security: common questions
Which is better, Cider Security or Noname Security?
On our 0-100 score Noname Security rates higher (68/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cider Security and Noname Security compare on the numbers?
Noname Security leads on our overall score (68/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (25/100 against 22/100), domain rating (90/100 against 40/100), headcount (380 against 9), headcount growth (+1.2% against -28.9%), funding raised ($225M against $38.0M), LinkedIn following (19,031 against 1,566).
Read the full Cider Security review and pricing or the Noname Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Cider Security alternatives we track.